Motorcycle has reached the end of its life cycle


Release time:

2019-12-19

Motorcyclehasreachedtheendofitslifecycle   Nowthattherearemorecars,motorcyclesarenotvalued.Especiallyforsomemotorcyclesthathavereachedtheirendoflife,manycarownersaretoolazytotakeoutinsurance.   Ifthistypeofcarhitstheroad,intheeventofanaccident,youcanonlypayforityourself.   No,inanincidentjustconcludedbythePinghuCourt,theperpetratorshadnoinsurance.Therefore,althoughbothpartieshaveresponsibilities,becausehehasnoinsurance,heneedstopaycompensationequivalenttotheamountofstronginsurance.   ThedrivernamedShenwasanativeofPinghu.October1st,2016wasNationalDay,andsomethinghappenedtoShenonthatday.Thatmorning,Shencameoutofacommunityintheurbanareaof​​Pinghubyridingthismotorcycle.Whenheturnedthroughanintersection,hecollidedwithanelectricbicycletravelingfromsouthtonorth.   TheowneroftheelectricbicyclewasnamedZhang.Duetotherelativelylargeimpactforce,bothcarsweredamaged,andZhangwasinjuredintheaccident.Afterinvestigationbythetrafficpolicebrigade,bothpartiesbearequalresponsibilityintheaccident.   Aftertheaccident,ZhangcametothePinghuTraditionalChineseMedicineHospitalfortreatment,andspentatotalofmorethan1,000yuanonmedicalexpenses.Later,afterbeingidentifiedbyaprofessionalorganization,Zhangsufferedaleftshouldertraumaandafractureoftheleftmiddleclavicleduetoacaraccident.Heplanstopay120daysoflostwork,60daysofnursing,and90daysofnutrition.   Asthetwopartiesfailedtonegotiatecompensation,ZhangandShen,themotorcycleowner,wenttocourtanddemandedcompensationformorethan25,000yuan.   ThecourtheardthatShenandZhangwereequallyresponsiblefortheaccident.Shen'smotorcyclewasnotinsuredaccordingtolaw,andShengwastheownerofthevehicle.Therefore,ZhangaskedShenandShengtobearwithinthelimitsoftheliabilityforstronginsurance.Requestforjointresponsibility.Inthiscase,Shen’smotorcyclewasnotoverdueforannualinspectionandreachedthescrapstandard.However,itdidnotprovethatthedefectwasoneofthecausesofthetrafficaccident.Therefore,thecourtshalldetermineathisdiscretionthatZhangshallberesponsibleforanylossthatexceedsthelimitofliabilityfortrafficinsurance60%liability.   AfterthecourtcombinedwiththeevidenceprovidedbyZhangandthecorrespondingclaims,itwasconfirmedthatZhang'stotallossof24,949.85yuanwascompensatedbyShenfor24,109.85yuanwithintheequivalentoftheliabilitylimitforstronginsurance,andShengwasjointlyandseverallyliable.

  Motorcycle has reached the end of its life cycle.
 
  Now that there are more cars, motorcycles are not valued. Especially for some motorcycles that have reached their end of life, many car owners are too lazy to take out insurance.
 
  If this type of car hits the road, in the event of an accident, you can only pay for it yourself.
 
  No, in an incident just concluded by the Pinghu Court, the perpetrators had no insurance. Therefore, although both parties have responsibilities, because he has no insurance, he needs to pay compensation equivalent to the amount of strong insurance.
 
  The driver named Shen was a native of Pinghu. October 1st, 2016 was National Day, and something happened to Shen on that day. That morning, Shen came out of a community in the urban area of ​​Pinghu by riding this motorcycle. When he turned through an intersection, he collided with an electric bicycle traveling from south to north.
 
  The owner of the electric bicycle was named Zhang. Due to the relatively large impact force, both cars were damaged, and Zhang was injured in the accident. After investigation by the traffic police brigade, both parties bear equal responsibility in the accident.
 
  After the accident, Zhang came to the Pinghu Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital for treatment, and spent a total of more than 1,000 yuan on medical expenses. Later, after being identified by a professional organization, Zhang suffered a left shoulder trauma and a fracture of the left middle clavicle due to a car accident. He plans to pay 120 days of lost work,60 days of nursing, and 90 days of nutrition.
 
  As the two parties failed to negotiate compensation, Zhang and Shen, the motorcycle owner, went to court and demanded compensation for more than 25,000 yuan.
 
  The court heard that Shen and Zhang were equally responsible for the accident. Shen's motorcycle was not insured according to law, and Sheng was the owner of the vehicle. Therefore, Zhang asked Shen and Sheng to bear within the limits of the liability for strong insurance. Request for joint responsibility. In this case, Shen ’s motorcycle was not overdue for annual inspection and reached the scrap standard. However, it did not prove that the defect was one of the causes of the traffic accident. Therefore, the court shall determine at his discretion that Zhang shall be responsible for any loss that exceeds the limit of liability for traffic insurance 60% liability.
 
  After the court combined with the evidence provided by Zhang and the corresponding claims, it was confirmed that Zhang's total loss of 24,949.85 yuan was compensated by Shen for 24,109.85 yuan within the equivalent of the liability limit for strong insurance, and Sheng was jointly and severally liable.